Rationality, Information Power and Institutional Theory

Alessandro Morselli


The objective of this paper is to show the importance of the role played by ‘power’ in economic analysis and how this, through information asymmetry, leads to the exercise of economic power of one unit over other units. This power derives from inequality in the amount of information possessed. The problem then arises of identifying tools to reduce the asymmetric information that generates the ‘domination’ effect of one individual over another. Institutional arrangements have been identified as alternative tools to the price mechanism, in order to favour individual decisions in a scenario marked by power, information and cognitive bounds. Thus, it will be highlighted how institutions favour symmetry in the conflicting relations of economic powers, in order to counteract the formation of unbalanced relations.             


Information asymmetry, domination, uncertainty, institutions, power, rationality

Full Text:




Akerlof G.A. (1970), “The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.

Akerlof G.A, Miyazaki H. (1980), “The implicit contract theory of unemployment meets the wage bill argument”, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(2), 321-338.

Arrow K.J. (1950), “A difficulty in the concept of social welfare”, Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328-46.

Arrow K. (1962), Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors, Cambridge, MA, NBER, 609–26.

Bartlett F. (1932), Remembering, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Böhm-Bawerk E. (1914), Macht oder ökonomisches gesetz?, Vienna, F.X. Weiss.

Broadbent D.E. (1958), Perception and communication, London, Pergamon.

Cazenave P., Morrison C. (1972), “Fonctions d’utilité interdépendantes et théorie de la redistribution en économie d’échange”, Revue écomique, 23(2), 214-242.

Chassagnon V. (2014), “Pouvoir et économie politique”, Revue Économique, 5(65), 719-742.

Diamond P. (1971), “A model of price adjustment”, Journal of Economic Theory, 3(2), 156-168.

Dockès P. (1999), Pouvoir et autorité en économie, Paris, Economica.

Elster J. (1979), Ulysses and the sirens, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Elster J. (1989), Nuts and bolts for the social sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Eucken W. (1944), Die grundlagen der nationalökonomie, Berlin, Springer.

Galbraith J.K. (1967), The new industrial state, London, Hamish Hamilton, chapter 5, 46-59.

Georgescu-Roegen (1971), The entropy law and the economic process”, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Hayek F. VON (1945), “The use of knowledge in society” American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.

Heiner R.A. (1983), “The origin of predictable behaviour”, American Economic Review, 73(4), 560-595.

Hodgson G. (1998), “The approach of institutional economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166-192.

Hunter A. (1958), “Notes on countervailing power”, Economic Journal, 68(269), 89-103.

Joffre P. (1999), “L’économie des coûts de transaction ou le marché et l’entreprise à la fin du XXe siècle”, dans G. Koenig (sous la direction de), De nouvelles théories pour gérer l’entreprise du XXIe siècle, Paris, Economica, 143-169.

Kuznets S. (1971), Notes on stage of economic growth as a system determinant. In: Eckstein A. (ed) Comparison of economic systems. Theoretical and methodological approaches, Berkeley, University of California Press, 243–267.

Lainé-Bloch F., Perroux F. (1966), L'entreprise et l'économie du XX siècle: étude internationale à l'initiative de François Bloch-Lainé et François Perroux, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1966.

Langlois R.N. (1986), Rationality institutions, and explanation, in R.N. Langlois (eds.), Economics as a process, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 225-255.

Lichnerowicz Marc and Andrè (1971), Économie et thermodynamique: un modèle d’échange économique, economies et sociétés, Ginevra, Droz.

Locke R. G. (1971), Social action: a brief analysis and a constructed type, Anthropological Forum, University of Australian Press.

March J.G., Olsen J.P. (1984), “The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life”, American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734-749.

Marschak J., Radner R. (1972), Economic theory of teams, New Haven and London, Yale University Press.

Ménard C. (1990), L’économie des organisations, Paris, La Découverte.

Miller G. (1956), “The magical number seven plus o minus two”, Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.

Morselli A. (2018), “From nation-state to world society: an institutional reading of globalisation, Journal of Economic Issues, 52(3), 653-675.

North D.C. (1981), Structure and change in economic history, New York, Norton & Co.

North D.C. (1990), Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

North D.C. (1994), “Economic performance through time”, American Economic Review, 84(3), 359-368.

Pantaleoni M. (1963), Tentativo di analisi del concetto di “forte” e di “debole” in economia, Padova, Cedam, vol. I.

Perroux F. (1948), “Esquisse d’une théorie de l’économie dominante”, Économie Appliquée, 1(2-3), 243-300.

Perroux F. (1950), “The domination effect and modern economic theory”, Social Research, 17(2), 188-206.

Perroux F. (1960), Économie et société, contrainte, échange et don, Parigi, PUF.

Perroux F. (1961), L’économie du XX siècle, Paris, PUF.

Perroux F. (1964), Économie et société, contrainte, échange et don, Parigi, PUF, 2° édition.

Perroux F. (1965), Les tecniques quantitatives de la planification, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

Perroux F. (1967), Sur la degré de généralité de la théorie de l’équilibre général, essais de généralisation, Economie et Societé, Cahiers de l’ISEA.

Perroux F. (1971), “Structure, structuralisme, modèles économiques”, Écomomie Appliquée, 3, 329-351.

Perroux F. (1972a), L’indépendance de la nation, Paris, Collection 10-18.

Perroux F. (1972b), Masse et classe, Paris, Casterman.

Perroux F. 1973. Pouvoir et Économie, Paris, Bordas.

Perroux F. (1975), Unités actives et mathématiques nouvelles: révision de la théorie de l’équilibre économique géneral, Paris, Dunod.

Perroux F. (1978), Il ruolo del potere nell’analisi economica, Milano, Franco Angeli Editore.

Preiser E. (1948), “Erkenntniswert und grenzen der grenzproduktivitätstheorie”, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 89(1), 25-45.

Radner R. (1968), “Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty”, Econometrica, 36(1), 31-58.

Rainelli M. (2010), “Économie industrielle et droit économique dans la Revue d’économie industrielle”, Revue D’Économie Industrielle, 1-2(129-130), 371-380.

Rallet Α. (2000), “Les deux économies de l'information”, Réseaux, 18(100), 299-330.

Rothschild K.W. (1976), Potere ed economia, Milano, Franco Angeli Editore.

Russel B. (1938), Power: a new social analysis, London, George Allen and Unwin.

Schotter A. (1981), The economic theory of social institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Simon H.A., March J.G. (1958), Organizations, New York, Wiley.

Simon H.A. (1982), Models of bounded rationality, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.

Smith A. (1776), An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, London, Edited By Edwin Cannon.

Stigler G.J. (1961), “The economics of information”, Journal of Political economy, 69(3), 213-225.

Stiglitz J.E. (1979), “Equilibrium in product markets with imperfect information”, American Economic Review, 69(2), 339-345.

Stiglitz J.E. (1985), “Information and economic analysis: a perspective”, The Economic Journal, 95, 21-41.

Thepaut Y. (2002), Pouvoir, information, économie, Paris, Éd. Economica, chapter 3.

Ulmer M.J. (1959), “Some reflections on economic theory”, De Economist, 107, 337-346.

Vito F. (1939), I sindacati industriali, consorzi e gruppi, Milano, Giuffrè.

Weber M. (1966), The theory of social and economic organization, New York, The Free Press.

Williamson O.E. (1985), The economic institution of capitalism, London, Macmillan.

Williamson O.E. (1995), “Legal implication of imperfect information in consumer markets: comment”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151(1), 49-51.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5920950

E-ISSN 2038-1379 -  2009-2023 University of Perugia